i'm becky garrison, i'm a freelance religion writer, and one thing i've noticed of late is what i call the rise of false equivalencies where they'll put out someone usually from the right based on the fact they're a colorful character, interesting, without any examination whatsoever of the veracity of their claims, their data site and so forth. presenting an article where on the youtube is a photo and video clip of someone saying something that is totally inaccurate that is unchallenged. and i'm wondering moving forward what you intend -- your thoughts on that. >> you've got to challenge both sides, yeah. ask questions, and i think it plays into what i was saying earlier about having assessments in the journalism and not just saying, like, you know, he said this, she said that, but actually saying this is what they both said, here are some other data points, and here's what is actually the case. so for lgbt issue, but for other -- >> yes. >> hi, chris. my name's dylan, i'm a student here in the college. i have a question more broadly about your work in the digital land scape. clearly,